Skip to content

Menu

The American Legal Blogger logo
HomeAboutContactSubmit Your BlogChannelsSubscribe
The American Legal Blogger logo
AboutChannelsPublishersSubscribeContact
The American Legal Blogger logo
Submit Your Blog
Search
Close

Start a Blog. Grow Your Practice.

Schedule Demo

The TAKE IT DOWN Act’s Notice and Removal Requirements Enter Into Effect

By asiegel@cov.com, Nicholas Xenakis, Diana Lee, Ali Cooper-Ponte & Kristen Chapman on June 16, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On May 19, 2026, the notice and removal requirements set forth in Section 3 of the Tools to Address Known Exploitation by Immobilizing Technological Deepfakes on Websites and Networks Act (“TAKE IT DOWN Act” or “TIDA”) entered into effect.  Under this section, covered platforms must establish a process for individuals to notify the platform of certain intimate visual depictions that were shared without their consent and to request their removal.  Covered platforms that receive valid requests must remove the visual depictions and identical copies within 48 hours.  The FTC, which enforces the TIDA, intends to do so “vigorously.”  The FTC has launched a website where individuals can submit complaints about platforms that fail to comply with these requirements and has sent warning letters advising companies of their obligations under the law.

TIDA’s application to “covered platforms.”  As described in our previous blog post, TIDA’s notice and removal requirements appear to apply broadly to a “covered platform,” which is defined as a website, online service, online applications, or mobile app that serves the public and either:

  1. “[P]rimarily provides” a forum for user-generated content, such as messages, videos, images, games, and audio files; or
  2. Makes available content of nonconsensual intimate visual depictions in the regular course of its trade or business. 

This definition excludes certain providers, including email and broadband internet access providers, as well as online services, applications, or websites that consist primarily of content that is not user-generated and instead is preselected by the provider, and for which any chat, comment, or interactive functionality is incidental to, directly related to, or dependent on the provision of preselected content.  Recent FTC guidance (discussed further below) states that this definition covers “various websites, apps, and online services, such as social media, messaging, image or video sharing, and gaming platforms.”

Section 3 notice and removal requirements.  Under TIDA Section 3, covered platforms must put in place a process for “identifiable” individuals, including minors, to notify the platform of certain intimate visual depictions and submit a request for removal.  Specifically, individuals (or an authorized person acting on their behalf) may seek the removal of intimate visual depictions that depict the individual and that were published without their consent.  Following receipt of a valid removal request, the platform must remove the depiction and make “reasonable efforts” to remove “known identical copies” of the depiction within 48 hours. 

Enforcement.  The FTC issued recent guidance on TIDA and sent letters to technology companies and websites reminding them of their obligations to comply with TIDA.  The FTC has also launched TakeItDown.ftc.gov, through which individuals can submit complaints about platforms that have failed to respond to valid requests to remove intimate photos or videos that were posted without their consent.  Separately, the Department of Justice has already secured a conviction and recently announced two arrests in criminal cases brought under TIDA’s separate criminal provisions, potentially signaling the Administration’s focus on TIDA enforcement generally. 

The FTC guidance on TIDA lists steps that covered platforms should take to comply with TIDA, including:

  • Providing “clear and conspicuous notice” to individuals about how to submit a removal request.
  • Establishing a process that “make[s] it easy for people to submit a removal request.”  For example, the FTC guidance states that, the platform could enable individuals to “submit a removal request directly from the photo or video.”  The guidance further notes that “TIDA’s protections are not limited to individuals who hold an account on your platform.”
  • The guidance further provides that “[p]latforms should make it easy for people to track the status of their removal requests” including by “provid[ing] an identifying number for each take down request your platform receives.” 
  • Additionally, platforms should “design [their] TIDA process to let people know you removed the reported content, or if not, why.”

The guidance also states that “[p]latforms must find and remove duplicate photos or videos.” In addition to these steps, the FTC guidance also advises covered platforms to consider using technology, such as hashing, to prevent the re-appearance of intimate content that has been removed from the platform.  The FTC recommends sharing these hashes with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and StopNCII.org, as appropriate.

Violations of Section 3.  Failure to comply with Section 3 of TIDA constitutes a violation of an FTC trade regulation rule, which subjects violators to the risk of civil penalties.  TIDA provides a safe harbor for a covered platform that, in good faith, disables access to or removes alleged nonconsensual intimate visual depictions based on facts or circumstances that indicate that the depiction was published in violation of TIDA.

If you are seeking additional guidance related to TIDA compliance, please reach out to our Covington team for support.

Photo of Nicholas Xenakis Nicholas Xenakis

Nick Xenakis draws on his Capitol Hill experience to provide regulatory and legislative advice to clients in a range of industries, including technology. He has particular expertise in matters involving the Judiciary Committees, such as intellectual property, antitrust, national security, immigration, and criminal…

Nick Xenakis draws on his Capitol Hill experience to provide regulatory and legislative advice to clients in a range of industries, including technology. He has particular expertise in matters involving the Judiciary Committees, such as intellectual property, antitrust, national security, immigration, and criminal justice.

Nick joined the firm’s Public Policy practice after serving most recently as Chief Counsel for Senator Dianne Feinstein (C-DA) and Staff Director of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Human Rights and the Law Subcommittee, where he was responsible for managing the subcommittee and Senator Feinstein’s Judiciary staff. He also advised the Senator on all nominations, legislation, and oversight matters before the committee.

Previously, Nick was the General Counsel for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he managed committee staff and directed legislative and policy efforts on all issues in the Committee’s jurisdiction. He also participated in key judicial and Cabinet confirmations, including of an Attorney General and two Supreme Court Justices. Nick was also responsible for managing a broad range of committee equities in larger legislation, including appropriations, COVID-relief packages, and the National Defense Authorization Act.

Before his time on Capitol Hill, Nick served as an attorney with the Federal Public Defender’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. There he represented indigent clients charged with misdemeanor, felony, and capital offenses in federal court throughout all stages of litigation, including trial and appeal. He also coordinated district-wide habeas litigation following the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States (invalidating the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act).

Read more about Nicholas Xenakis
Show more Show less
Photo of Diana Lee Diana Lee

Diana Lee is an associate in the firm’s London office and a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. Diana’s practice focuses on regulatory, enforcement, and litigation matters relating to electronic surveillance, law enforcement access to digital evidence, and data privacy…

Diana Lee is an associate in the firm’s London office and a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Practice Group. Diana’s practice focuses on regulatory, enforcement, and litigation matters relating to electronic surveillance, law enforcement access to digital evidence, and data privacy and cybersecurity. Before rejoining the firm, she clerked for Judge Victor A. Bolden, United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut.

Diana is a member of the Bars of New York and the District of Columbia.

Show more Show less
Photo of Ali Cooper-Ponte Ali Cooper-Ponte

Ali Cooper-Ponte draws on her experience at the U.S. Department of Justice to advise clients on complex and sensitive national security, cybersecurity, and online safety matters across regulatory, investigations, enforcement, and litigation contexts.

In her investigations and litigation practice, Ali guides clients through…

Ali Cooper-Ponte draws on her experience at the U.S. Department of Justice to advise clients on complex and sensitive national security, cybersecurity, and online safety matters across regulatory, investigations, enforcement, and litigation contexts.

In her investigations and litigation practice, Ali guides clients through both internal and government investigations. She helps clients across industries navigate significant enterprise risks, including insider, criminal, and advanced persistent or nation-state threats, as well as challenges relating to emerging technologies. She has also helped clients proactively engage with or respond to inquiries by the U.S. Department of Justice, state Attorneys General, and the Federal Trade Commission.

In her advisory practice, Ali helps clients strategically manage rapidly-changing regulatory and technological landscapes. She counsels clients on compliance with national security, cybersecurity, data privacy, content moderation, and child exploitation laws. She has particular expertise on issues relating to government access to data, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and the Fourth Amendment. She also has significant experience with new Federal and state laws implicating Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and the First Amendment. Here, her experience spans industries (including the technology, healthcare, cryptocurrency and financial services, and aerospace and defense industries) and includes providing practical advice on new legislation, regulatory frameworks, and court rulings as well as developing legislative proposals and potential challenges to new legislation and government action.

Previously, Ali served in the U.S. Department of Justice as Senior Counsel in the Office of the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, where she focused on the cyber and child exploitation portfolios, and as a Trial Attorney in the National Security Division’s National Security Cyber Section and the Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section. She joined the Justice Department as part of its inaugural class of Cyber Fellows, which gave her broad exposure to the Department’s work to address cyber and cyber-enabled threats.

Earlier in her career, Ali clerked for Judge José A. Cabranes on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Prior to law school, Ali worked as a legal investigations specialist focused on electronic surveillance and law enforcement access issues at a large technology company.

In addition to her regular practice, Ali leverages her experience to counsel pro bono clients engaged in work to protect children and civil liberties.

Read more about Ali Cooper-Ponte
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Inside Privacy
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Subscribe to The American Legal Blogger

Subscribe Today
The American Legal Blogger logo
RSS Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
  • Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Channels
  • Publishers
  • Contact

Welcome to American Legal Blogger

American Legal Blogger is a collaboration between the ABA Journal and LexBlog that brings together, in one place, the blogs, podcasts, and other insights and guidance generated by blogging lawyers across the US.

Learn more
Copyright © 2026, The American Legal Blogger. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo