The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Murray v. UBS eliminates the use of “intentional retaliation” to defeat Federal Rail Safety Act whistleblower cases. But Murray does much more than that. By clarifying the FRSA’s two step burden of proof, it serves as a road map for winning “late” or “false” injury report FRSA cases. Here’s
Latest Post
More Posts
Spotlight on Maritime Whistleblowers
The Death of “Intentional Retaliation”
The End of “Intentional Retaliation”
A Landmark Seaman’s Protection Act Development
Another Circuit Holds Subjective Belief Alone Is Enough
Transportation Infrastructure Fraud Whistleblowing
FRSA Alert! Landmark Decision Clarifies Good Faith Safety Reporting
What Is Clear and Convincing Evidence?
When Reporting a Worker’s Illness Is Protected From Discipline
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org