This case addresses the application of issue preclusion in relation to the validity of three patents. In particular, this case focuses on the implications of decisions made during the dismissal of pending litigations and examines whether these decisions render judgments final, justifying the application of issue preclusion to invalidate concurrently asserted patents.
About
Joshua Weisenfeld is an associate in the Intellectual Property Group in the firm's San Diego (Del Mar) office.
Latest Post
More Posts
Clearing the Path Forward: The Critical Role of Patent Searches
The Double-Edged Sword of AI in Patent Drafting and Prosecution
Precluded, Not Repeated: WARF & Apple Continue to Shape our Understanding of Issue Preclusion in Patent Law
Interpreting the Printed Matter Doctrine in Inter Partes Review
About
Joshua Weisenfeld is an associate in the Intellectual Property Group in the firm's San Diego (Del Mar) office.