Individuals have the right to receive meaningful information about solely automated decisions with significant effects under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This includes decisions that will impact an individual’s finances or employment. But how much information are individuals entitled to receive? Should they be given the underlying algorithm, or merely a high-level explanation, or
About
Marcus is a communications, media and technology lawyer based in London. He focuses on data privacy and IT services.
Latest Post
More Posts
Prohibited practices under the AI Act: Answered and unanswered questions in the Commission’s guidelines

The Commission’s guidelines on AI systems – what can we infer?
CJEU Advocate General clarifies when pseudonymised data falls outside the definition of personal data
Online Safety Act: Protecting Children from Harmful Content Online – Ofcom’s Guidance on Age Assurance for Part 3 Services
The EDPB Opinion on training AI models using personal data and recent Garante fine – lawful deployment of LLMs
China’s proposed AI Labelling Regulations: Key points
The UK’s Public Authority Algorithmic and Automated Decision-Making Systems Bill: key takeaways

Lessons on international transfers to the US to organisations caught by the GDPR

Recent regulatory developments in training AI models under the GDPR
About
Marcus is a communications, media and technology lawyer based in London. He focuses on data privacy and IT services.