The more the merrier is not always true. Ask any defendant in a trial that consolidates the claims of multiple plaintiffs. The existence of multiple plaintiffs can conjure up an inference of guilt. If you are accused of hurting more than one person, that seems to increase the chance that the factfinder will conclude that
Latest Post
More Posts
SCOTUS Roundup
N.D. Illinois Nixes Chocolate Fraud Lawsuit; Holds that the Illinois Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act Does Not Create a Private Right of Action
J&J MDL Court Agrees with New Jersey State Appellate Court that Lead Plaintiff Law Firm Must be Disqualified
EDPA Dismisses Acthar RICO/Antitrust/Fraud Case
SDNY Holds that Defendant AI Inquiries Made Without Counsel’s Input Were not Shielded by Attorney-Client Privilege or Work Product Doctrine
Court Enjoins Texas Food/Beverage Warnings as Forced Speech Violative of First Amendment
Plaintiff Talc Law Firm Disqualified after Working with Defendant’s Former Lawyer on Settlement Strategy
Court Upholds California Ban on “Flavored” Tobacco
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Dilution of “Reasonable Certainty” Standard for Expert `testimony
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org