Archer

In many jurisdictions, the law dictates that people cannot benefit from their crimes.  In the realm of the administration of decedent’s estates, this principle takes the form of “slayer statutes” which state that a killer cannot inherit from their victim.  Where these statutes traditionally disinherit beneficiaries who kill the testator, some states have expanded their

In re Estate of Kremer, 2024 WL 4964639 (N.J. Super. Dec. 4, 2024)
This case deals with revocation of wills and related points.
Bonnie Levine executed a will in 1992.  The will named Bonnie’s sisters, Pamela McGinnis and Patrice Berman, as executrix and contingent executrix, respectively.
In 1997, Bonnie married Joseph Kremer. The couple had

Mooney v. Convery, Nos. A-1576-22, A-1577-22 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Nov. 13, 2024)
This case came before the Appellate Division after the trial court awarded attorney fees but directed payment only after the defendant fully satisfied the judgment, rather than from a fund in court under Rule 4:42-9(a)(2).
John J. Mooney passed away on June

Nolasco v. Estate of Nolasco, Docket No. A-3176-22, 2024 WL 4563243 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Oct. 24, 2024)
 
This matter concerns a quiet title claim brought against the estate (“Estate”) of Otilio Nolasco (“Otilio” or “decedent”) by plaintiff Jose Nolasco (“Jose”) concerning real estate in North Plainfield, New Jersey. The Estate appealed two orders:

Ventre v. Balsamo, 2024 WL 4749519, (N.J. Super. App. Div. Nov. 12, 2024)
This matter came before the Appellate Division because the trial court found the plaintiff’s legal malpractice against claim against Arthur Balsamo, Esquire (“Attorney”) barred under the entire controversy doctrine and the doctrine of collateral estoppel.  The Appellate Division affirmed the Law Division’s

In re Estate of R.S., No. A-3452-22 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Oct. 31, 2024)
The defendant appealed an Order appointing the plaintiff as the administrator of the decedent’s estate.  The Appellate Division reversed and remanded.
The defendant was adopted by the decedent and his spouse from Russia shortly after he was born in 1993.  The

In re Estate of Kenneth C. Haugh, 2024 WL 4664488 (Pa. Super. Nov. 4, 2024)
This matter came before the Superior Court on appeal from the Orphans’ Court granting declaratory judgment in favor of Deborah Haugh, wife of testator Kenneth Haugh, after she died in October 2022.  The primary issues decided on appeal were whether

Geswaldo v. Geswaldo, 2024 WL 4615590, No. A-3540-21 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Oct. 30, 2024)
Christine and Rachel Geswaldo (the “sisters”) appealed a decision in favor of their sister-in-law, Joan Geswaldo, regarding a dispute over a family trust and real estate partnership.
In 1991, Joseph, the siblings’ father, set up a trust to hold two

Krivulka v. Lerner, No. 2:20-CV-09724, 2024 WL 4318735 (D.N.J. Sept. 27, 2024)
This is one in a series of decisions stemming from a legal malpractice action for estate planning.
The defendants/lawyers had acted as counsel for the decedent, Joseph Krivulka, and his wife, plaintiff Angela Krivulka, for estate planning and other purposes.
The plaintiff alleged