In the case of Turner v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co., No. 2:24-CV-00939-JFM (E.D. Pa. Aug. 14, 2024 Murphy, J.), the court granted a motion to remand a class action regarding UM/UIM coverage issues after finding that grounds for federal court jurisdiction were not met by the carrier. The court noted that this case was
Foley, Comerford & Cummins Blogs
Latest from Foley, Comerford & Cummins
Petition To Open Default Judgment Denied
In the case of Grit Drexel, LLC v. Crescent Abstract, LLC, April Term, 2023, No. 01466 (C.P. Phila. Co April 12, 2024 Patrick, J.), the court issued a Rule 1925 Opinion indicating that its Order granting a default judgment in favor of the Plaintiff property owner against a title company should be affirmed. The
WHO BETTER TO CONVINCE A CARRIER TO SETTLE?
Summary Judgment Granted in Parking Lot Case Based on Open and Obvious Doctrine
In the case of Ersick v. Joe’s Store, No. 3082-CV-2022 (C.P. Westmoreland Co. July 25, 2024 Smail, J.), the court addressed issues in a premises liability case. According to the Opinion, this matter involved a trip and fall in the parking lot of a store. The Plaintiff allegedly fell over a black and yellow
Save the Date: November 14, 2024 – Lackawanna Pro Bono Gala
Judge Karoline Mehalchick of Middle District Federal Court Issues Novel Civil Practice Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Documents Filed With Court
In the case of E.J. v. Johnson, No. 3:23-CV-1636 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 19, 2024 Mehalchick, J.), Judge Karoline Mehalchick of the Federal Middle District Court of Pennsylvania has taken the innovative step of issuing a Civil Practice Order on Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence.Under this Order, which appears to be the first of its
Motion To Dismiss in UIM Bad Faith Claim Denied
In the case of Debree v. American States Ins. Co., No. 3:20-CV-00247-JKM (M.D. Pa. July 30, 2024 Munley, J.), the court denied a UIM carrier’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in a case alleging breach of contract and insurance bad faith. The Defendant focused its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Plaintiff’s bad
Service of Summons Issues Addressed By Federal Court
Pennsylvania Superior Court Addresses the Borrowed Servant Doctrine in a Workplace Accident Case (Non-Precedential)
In the Non-Precedential decision in the case of Ortiz v. Lincoln Electric Automation, Inc., No. 1384 EDA 2023 (Pa. Super. June 26, 2024 Panella, J., Nichols, J., and Beck, J.) (Op. by Panella, J.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court confirmed the entry of summary judgment in favor of a Defendant under the borrowed employee doctrine.
