On February 21, 2025, President Donald J. Trump released a National Security Presidential Memorandum (“Memorandum”) proposing broad revisions to the inbound and outbound investment screening review processes maintained and administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), including the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”).
In its recent decision in Manti Holdings, LLC v. The Carlyle Group Inc., C.A. No. 2020-0657-SG (Del. Ch. Jan. 7, 2025), the Delaware Court of Chancery reaffirmed the high bar plaintiffs must meet to show that a private equity fund’s motivation to complete the sale of a portfolio company prior to the end of the
Public companies would be well advised, on a lovely, clear day (in the Delaware sense), to update their advance notice bylaws. In the normal course these bylaws receive little attention, but in the event of an activist campaign they are critical to the board’s ability to discharge its fiduciary duties. The board will have a
On October 10, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) voted unanimously to adopt the final rule[1] for the new Hart-Scott-Rodino (“HSR”) Act Form and Instructions, with the concurrence of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”).[2] As anticipated, the new rule entails the most significant revamp of the HSR Form in the nearly 50-year history
The Delaware Supreme Court in Kellner v. Aim Immunotech[1]recently ruled on the enforceability of a “modern” set of advance notice bylaws. Advance notice bylaws are the key tool corporations have to regulate the director nomination process and ensure full and fair disclosure to stockholders in a proxy fight. Critically, advance notice bylaws also
Key Takeaways
Activist Settlements and A Proposed Amendment to the DGCL
Perhaps the most fundamental expectation of public company investors is the expectation of investing in a company run by a board of directors – a board elected by stockholders and charged with managing the corporation on behalf of all stockholders. Delaware seems primed to upset that
Summary
Founders and controlling stockholders often seek to retain control over their companies even after taking them public, typically via high-vote share classes or, as was at issue in this case, via stockholder agreements granting the pre-IPO owners broad governance rights.
In West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. Moelis & Company, the Delaware Court
This is the price paid for allowing our hopes, rather than established law, to guide public merger agreement drafting for the last 18 years. Con Edison v Northeast Utilities[1], a 2005 Second Circuit decision regarding a New York law governed merger agreement, found that, absent clear contractual language to the contrary, a target
On November 2, 2023, the New York Appellate Division, First Department held for the first time that New York state courts hearing claims under the Securities Act of 1933 are required to stay discovery pending resolution of a motion to dismiss under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”).[1]
