Blog Authors

Latest from A Brief Review

As a Connecticut appellate attorney, I often work with trial attorneys at the post-judgment stage—sometimes on a full appeal, but other times to explore whether an appeal can be avoided. One way to do that in Connecticut is by filing a motion to reargue / motion for reconsideration—formally known as a Practice Book § 11-11

Connecticut Appellate Law Firm is pleased to share that Connecticut appellate attorney Megan Wade will be presenting a continuing legal education program for the Fairfield County Bar Association on May 7, 2025.  The CLE—From Trial to Appeal: Preserving Issues and Perfecting the Record—is designed for both trial and appellate attorneys. It will offer practical strategies

Since launching Connecticut Appellate Law Firm, one of the most frequently asked questions I have received is: “How long does a Connecticut civil or family appeal take to resolve?”   In legal practice, the answer is often “it depends.”   Under typical circumstances and without any special motions or complexities, the process from filing an appeal to

When an appellant challenges a trial court’s factual findings, attention to procedural rules is crucial. In Park Seymour Associates, LLC v. City of Hartford / Park Squire Associates, LLC v. City of Hartford, the plaintiffs discovered this the hard way. Despite their reliance on testimony to argue that the trial court’s factual findings were clearly

In North Branford Citizens Against Bulk Propane Storage v. Town of North Branford et al., the Connecticut Appellate Court considered a plaintiff-association’s challenge to a zoning regulation amendment that allowed the construction of a bulk propane storage facility in North Branford.   In resolving the appeal, the Appellate Court relied on an unpreserved alternative ground for

The Connecticut Supreme Court recently tackled a nuanced legal issue in Suprynowicz v. Tohan: whether allegations involving a reproductive endocrinologist’s misconduct during IVF procedures should be classified as wrongful life claims or ordinary negligence. This decision provides key insights into Connecticut tort law and the fine line between these two claim types, offering guidance to

An Insurer’s Conduct Can Render a Cancellation Notice Ambiguous  An insurer’s conduct can render a cancellation notice that otherwise complies with General Statutes § 31-348 indefinite, uncertain, and ambiguous. This decision from the Connecticut Supreme Court highlights the importance of clarity in cancellations and provides guidance for attorneys handling such cases.  Case Background Thomas Napolitano, doing

What happens when the trial court’s reasoning falters on appeal? For appellees, alternative grounds for affirmance can save the day.  Appellees must consider all possible bases for affirmance, including those not relied on by the trial court. By raising and briefing alternative grounds, appellees provide appellate courts with additional paths to uphold a decision.  The