As a Connecticut appellate attorney, I often work with trial attorneys at the post-judgment stage—sometimes on a full appeal, but other times to explore whether an appeal can be avoided. One way to do that in Connecticut is by filing a motion to reargue / motion for reconsideration—formally known as a Practice Book § 11-11
A Brief Review
Blog Authors
Latest from A Brief Review
Attorney Megan Wade to Present CLE on Issue Preservation
Connecticut Appellate Law Firm is pleased to share that Connecticut appellate attorney Megan Wade will be presenting a continuing legal education program for the Fairfield County Bar Association on May 7, 2025. The CLE—From Trial to Appeal: Preserving Issues and Perfecting the Record—is designed for both trial and appellate attorneys. It will offer practical strategies…
When Can a Court Deviate from Child Support Guidelines? Avoiding Reversal on Appeal
When awarding child support, Connecticut courts must follow the child support guidelines, which establish a presumptive amount based on the parents’ incomes. A court may deviate from these guidelines, however, only if it makes three specific findings on the record to justify the deviation. Failure to do so can result in reversal on appeal. A…
How Long Does the Appellate Process Take in Connecticut? A Comprehensive Guide for Civil and Family Appeals
Since launching Connecticut Appellate Law Firm, one of the most frequently asked questions I have received is: “How long does a Connecticut civil or family appeal take to resolve?” In legal practice, the answer is often “it depends.” Under typical circumstances and without any special motions or complexities, the process from filing an appeal to…
Connecticut Family Law Appeal: Trial Court’s Visitation Order Overturned
In Cardona v. Padilla, the Connecticut Appellate Court considered whether the trial court abused its discretion in making its custody and visitation orders, which substantially limited the non-custodial parent’s access to parenting time with the child. In this family appeal, the Appellate Court held that the trial court abused its discretion because the trial court…
Appealing Factual Findings? Not Without Transcripts
When an appellant challenges a trial court’s factual findings, attention to procedural rules is crucial. In Park Seymour Associates, LLC v. City of Hartford / Park Squire Associates, LLC v. City of Hartford, the plaintiffs discovered this the hard way. Despite their reliance on testimony to argue that the trial court’s factual findings were clearly…
Lack of Standing as an Unpreserved Alternative Ground for Affirmance
In North Branford Citizens Against Bulk Propane Storage v. Town of North Branford et al., the Connecticut Appellate Court considered a plaintiff-association’s challenge to a zoning regulation amendment that allowed the construction of a bulk propane storage facility in North Branford. In resolving the appeal, the Appellate Court relied on an unpreserved alternative ground for…
Understanding Ordinary Negligence and Wrongful Life Claims in Connecticut: A Look at Suprynowicz v. Tohan
The Connecticut Supreme Court recently tackled a nuanced legal issue in Suprynowicz v. Tohan: whether allegations involving a reproductive endocrinologist’s misconduct during IVF procedures should be classified as wrongful life claims or ordinary negligence. This decision provides key insights into Connecticut tort law and the fine line between these two claim types, offering guidance to…
Connecticut Supreme Court Clarifies Workers’ Compensation Insurance Policy Cancellation Rules
An Insurer’s Conduct Can Render a Cancellation Notice Ambiguous An insurer’s conduct can render a cancellation notice that otherwise complies with General Statutes § 31-348 indefinite, uncertain, and ambiguous. This decision from the Connecticut Supreme Court highlights the importance of clarity in cancellations and provides guidance for attorneys handling such cases. Case Background Thomas Napolitano, doing…
Why Alternative Grounds for Affirmance Matter for Appellees
What happens when the trial court’s reasoning falters on appeal? For appellees, alternative grounds for affirmance can save the day. Appellees must consider all possible bases for affirmance, including those not relied on by the trial court. By raising and briefing alternative grounds, appellees provide appellate courts with additional paths to uphold a decision. The…