Latest from A Winning Tip

 A
focus group has many benefits, among the primary being the opinions the mock jurors
offer on the case—the strengths, weaknesses, validity of themes, etc.  However, focus group jurors can only provide
opinions when asked the right questions. Too often, lawyers ask focus group
jurors to deliberate and discuss only the verdict questions. This

 The courtroom setting is unfamiliar to most prospective
jurors as they sit with a group of strangers and are grilled by counsel during
voir dire. In addition, potential jurors may respond differently depending on
whether they want to be off or on a particular jury. Therefore, their responses
may not entirely reflect that person’s

 Rare is the witness who isn’t anxious, worried, scared–even
terrified–during deposition or cross-examination. Often this leads to a rapid
pace of speech. Not only that, but witnesses tend to believe that if they just
blurt out their response, they’ll get this dreadful experience over with
sooner.Now, there’s nothing wrong with speaking quickly, in and

 The brilliant cartoonist, Wiley Miller (“Non
Sequitur
”), captured the misunderstandings between men and women as few
others have. For example, the wife says: “Let’s go shopping.” The husband
hears: “Let’s go drain the life force from your body.” The husband
says: “Honey, are you almost ready yet?” The wife hears: “Life as

 Too often, in jury debriefings and in focus groups, jurors
complain that the attorneys do not connect their points or evidence to the
specifics of the complaint. Furthermore, attorneys rarely fully explain the
jury instructions to the jury, tying in those instructions to the attorney’s
interpretation of the case.In a classic case, namely the

For your expert witnesses under the gun of
cross-examination, usually the most problematic answer is a flat “yes” or “no.”
Science holds few absolutes to be true, thus most scientists (which is the
majority of your experts) are uncomfortable with an uncategorical “yes” or “no”
in response to many of opposing counsel’s questions.Yet opposing counsel

 Research has demonstrated repeatedly the power of storytelling.
Indeed, it’s easy for most attorneys to tell the story of their injured client
or the malfunction of a product. Stories of individuals, plaintiff or defense,
are also fairly easy to summon. But when it comes to businesses, companies or
corporations, lawyers too often forget the

 Timelines are essential to just about any case. I’ve been
teased by various attorneys I’ve worked with that I always recommend a
timeline, and indeed it’s true.But there is a method to my repeated,“You need a timeline!” The
movement of events across time is how jurors anchor testimony in their minds.
It’s how they