ERISA Litigation

Trends & Insights

THE BENEFIT TO AN EMPLOYER OF INCLUDING BOTH A RELEASE AND A COVENANT NOT TO SUE IN A SEPARATION OR SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH AN EMPLOYEE

ERISA class actions have been plaguing corporate America for more than a decade.  There is no universally accepted application of the pleading standards for ERISA fee and performance cases, which

A recently filed lawsuit is a good reminder that self-insured health plan fiduciaries have a fiduciary duty to ensure that their health plans are being administered according to the plan’s terms and in compliance with law, while defraying the reasonable expenses of administering the plan.  In discharging this responsibility, plan fiduciaries must oversee any party

Recent Decision Places Spotlight on Coordination Between DOL and Plaintiffs’ Firms

Defending ERISA claims against an enterprising plaintiffs’ bar is challenging enough. That task becomes even more challenging when the Department of Labor (“DOL”) is working behind the scenes to support private-sector litigants.  For example, the DOL has the power to issue subpoenas for documents

Earlier this year, current and former participants of two ERISA-governed health plans filed complaints alleging the same novel legal theory: that plan fiduciaries violated ERISA by mismanaging the plan’s prescription drug benefits.  In both complaints, plaintiffs alleged that the mismanagement was caused in part by the plans paying excessive and unreasonable fees to their respective

Effective January 1, 2024, the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement 2.0 Act (“SECURE 2.0”) allows employers to make matching contributions under defined contribution plans based on employees’ qualified student loan payments.  Although student loan matching contribution programs could provide a significant new benefit for employees with student loan obligations, few employers have amended their

Imagine you’re a plan administrator who receives an angry letter from an out-of-network provider.  The letter explains that before treating a plan participant, the provider called to confirm the participant’s eligibility for out-of-network coverage and to authorize treatments at certain rates under the plan.  Now that treatment has been rendered, the provider is demanding payment

In a previous blog post, we provided an overview concerning whether plan service provider agreements may be required to be disclosed to participants under Section 104(b)(4) of ERISA. A recent district court decision in California puts a renewed spotlight on this issue for employers and plan administrators who may receive these types of document

Potentially signaling a new wave of litigation, AT&T Inc. and AT&T Services, Inc. (AT&T) were hit with a class-action lawsuit on March 11, 2024 filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts relating to the 2023 transfer of $8 billion of their pension liabilities – covering approximately 96,000 participants in AT&T’s pension plan