Latest from IPethics & INsights

Lawyers love to talk about their client success stories and latest wins, particularly on websites, blogs, LinkedIn and other social media.  This form of lawyer self-promotion is particularly pronounced in litigation matters, where the victorious lawyers and their firms routinely, and proudly, announce to the world what wonderful result they achieved for their client.
Many

The USPTO has once again disclosed confidential information of applicants—this time for patent applicants.  Previously, the USPTO has disclosed confidential information of trademark applicants, including a breach of home addresses.  However, many practitioners have wondered—what are their obligations with respect to the USPTO’s actions.
Duty to Communicate with Clients
When the

The USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) handles investigations and disciplinary proceedings against attorneys and other practitioners who engage in misconduct before the USPTO. Navigating these complex proceedings without legal representation can be a daunting and perilous task.  We have covered previously various best practices regarding what to do if you find yourself with

This week marks five years since the USPTO implemented its Requirement of U.S. Licensed Attorney for Trademark Applicants and Registrants.  Also known as the “U.S. Counsel Rule”,  the USPTO on August 2, 2019 amended parts 2, 7, and 11 of Title 37 to require any non-U.S. domiciled trademark applicant, registrant, or party to a

37 CFR 11.801 is a regulation that imposes a duty on practitioners to cooperate with the Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED).  The regulation is divided into two key provisions that apply to applicants for registration, and those under disciplinary/reinstatement investigation:
False Statements: The regulation first proscribes making false statements of material fact.  This is

The USPTO’s reputation for being focused on signatures is growing almost as fast as pendency.  However, with recent court decisions, much is left to the eye of the beholder–leaving practitioners and their clients uncertain regarding the state of the law.
Why Signatures Matter to the USPTO
37 CFR 11.18 mandates a two-part certification process whenever

In the past year, I have seen an increase in questions related to artificial intelligence.  Specifically, patent and trademark lawyers have asked whether it is permissible for those lawyers engaged in practice before the USPTO to use Generative AI.  While I have and continue to present on this topic multiple times, including (here),