Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act
Leszanczuk v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, No. 21-1367 (December 28, 2021) N.D. Ill., E. Div. AffirmedDist. Ct. did not err in dismissing for failure to state cause of action plaintiff’s claim that defendant breached mortgage agreement and violated Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act
Bank of New York Mellon v. Dubrovay, 2021 IL App (2d) 190540 (November 17, 2021) Du Page Co. (McLAREN) Reversed and remanded.Court granted Defendant’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s 4th foreclosure complaint for violating the single refiling rule of section 13-217 of Code of Civil Procedure. Because Plaintiff’s accelerations occurred by the filing of foreclosure
Your mortgage payments increased unexpectedly. Maybe your escrow balance is low, taxes increased, or your insurance premium increased. In any event, you want to verify the information your bank or loan servicers has on file. You call the servicer and often you must depend on their word if you are able to obtain an answer
JP Morgan vs. Bell
Case Number:
2020 IL App (3d) 190128
Decision Date:
Wednesday, July 1, 2020
District:
3d Dist.
Division/County:
Will Co.
A review of the recent Will County, Illinois case JP Morgan vs. Bell 2020 IL App (3d) 190128 (2020) raises two issues:
Issue (s):
A foreclosure can be a sprint or a marathon. It is contingent on whether the homeowner
will allow the bank to run its race (“aka the foreclosure process”) with
opposition and hurdles or with a clear lane to the finish line. In Illinois, the bank is required to go
through the foreclosure process to obtain
I am a proud Chicago native. I grew up on Chicago’s South Side. I graduated from the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana and was accepted to law school at the University of Illinois College of Law.
I deferred law school for two years to teach fourth grade in the Mississippi River Delta area. I decided
