Brands: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Branding has emerged as a cornerstone of marketing practice and corporate strategy. This book brings together a curated selection of the most influential and thought-provoking papers on brands and branding from Consumption Markets and Culture, reflecting the wide-ranging, interdisciplinary interest in the topic, accompanied by new introductions from leading brand scholars, including
Requirements regarding ‘typographical distinctiveness”:
ERIK M. UNDERWOOD, a Colorado citizen; MY24HOURNEWS.COM, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee.
ZESTY PAWS LLC, Plaintiff,v.NUTRAMAX LABORATORIES, INC., et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.June 4, 2024.
Dexon Computer, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. Am., No. 23-1328 (8th Cir. 2024)
Justia: Dexon Computer, Inc., a reseller of computer networking products, was sued by Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco Technologies, Inc. for federal trademark infringement and counterfeiting. The complaint alleged trademark infringements between 2006 and 2010, and thirty-five acts of infringement between
Donald Judd was a minimalist furniture designer so I’ll leave it at that. His La Mansana tables and chairs now go for $90K and $9k respectively. The Judd Foundation, his successor in interest (he passed in 1994), asserts trade dress in the La Mansana table and corresponding chairs (see photos below and in complaint,
CreeLED, Inc., Plaintiff,v.The Individuals, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule “A,” Defendants.
Case No. 24-20081-Civ-Martinez/Sanchez.
United States District Court, S.D. Florida.March 8, 2024.
If you receive a Rule 68 judgment, be careful how you crow about it.
Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is structured to motivate defendants to make settlement offers. It provides that
At least 14 days before the date set for trial, a party defending against a claim may serve on an
LEDO PIZZA SYSTEM, INC. & LEDO PIZZA CARRYOUTS, INC., Plaintiffs,v.LEDO’S INC., Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 7, 2024.
The defendant’s fraud claim fails even to get out of the starting blocks, because the defendant has failed to adequately establish standing to assert the claim.[5] A
Amazon satisfies multi-factor test for default:
AMAZON.COM INC; JL CHILDRESS CO INC, Plaintiff, v.TANG ZHI; ET AL, Defendant.
Case No. 2:20-cv-01215-TMC-MLP.
United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma.
Motion for default denied wo prejudice for failure to show personal jurisdiction:
HAMMER BRAND, LLC, Plaintiff,v.VORO INC., et al., Defendants.
Case No. 8:23-cv-01272-KKM-NHA.
United States District Court,
VAN LEEUWEN ICE CREAM LLC, Plaintiff, v.REBEL CREAMERY LLC, Defendant.
United States District Court, E.D. New York.March 11, 2024.
