Skip to content

Menu

The American Legal Blogger logo
HomeAboutContactSubmit Your BlogChannelsSubscribe
The American Legal Blogger logo
AboutChannelsPublishersSubscribeContact
The American Legal Blogger logo
Submit Your Blog
Search
Close

Start a Blog. Grow Your Practice.

Schedule Demo

EEOC Rescinds Biden-Era Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace

By Evandro Gigante, Arielle E. Kobetz, Laura Fant & Andrew Landesman on January 23, 2026
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) rescinded by vote its April 2024 Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace.  The rescission eliminated the guidance in full, without a notice and comment period, signaling a landmark recalibration of the EEOC’s approach to harassment enforcement.

As Proskauer previously covered, alongside discussion regarding harassment based on protected characteristics such as race, religion, age, and disability, the guidance extended broad protection for LGBTQ+ employees against harassing conduct based on sexual orientation and gender identity.  The guidance provided that harassing conduct on the basis of these categories may include “outing (disclosure of an individual’s sexual orientation or gender identity without permission); … repeated and intentional use of a name or pronoun inconsistent with the individual’s known gender identity (misgendering); or the denial of access to a bathroom or other sex-segregated facility consistent with the individual’s gender identity.”  

This move from the EEOC is the latest step as the agency continues to build upon its previously announced enforcement priorities, including “defend[ing] the biological and binary reality of sex and related rights.”    Moreover, in May 2025, a federal judge already struck portions of the guidance which addressed sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination, aligning with the Trump Administration’s directive to enforce the binary sex mandate and limit the scope of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clay County, in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s prohibition on discrimination “on the basis of sex” includes discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Takeaways

Despite the rescission, Title VII’s statutory mandates and the Supreme Court’s ruling in Bostock remain unchanged.  Employers also must be mindful of applicable state and/or local laws that prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity or expression.

We anticipate further updates in this area as the EEOC and other civil rights agencies continue to move forward with their enforcement efforts and will continue to monitor and report on these updates.

Photo of Evandro Gigante Evandro Gigante

Evandro Gigante is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration group and the Hiring & Terminations group. He represents and counsels clients through a variety of labor and employment matters, including allegations of…

Evandro Gigante is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration group and the Hiring & Terminations group. He represents and counsels clients through a variety of labor and employment matters, including allegations of race, gender, national origin, disability and religious discrimination, sexual harassment, wrongful discharge, defamation and breach of contract. Evandro also counsels employers through reductions-in-force and advises clients on restrictive covenant issues, such as confidentiality, non-compete and non-solicit agreements.

With a focus on discrimination and harassment matters, Evandro has extensive experience representing clients before federal and state courts. He has tried cases in court and before arbitrators and routinely represents clients before administrative agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, as well as state and local human rights commissions.

Read more about Evandro Gigante
Show more Show less
Photo of Arielle E. Kobetz Arielle E. Kobetz

Arielle Kobetz is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department. She assists employers in a wide range of areas, including discrimination, wage and hour, and traditional labor.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Arielle served as a law clerk at the New York…

Arielle Kobetz is an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department. She assists employers in a wide range of areas, including discrimination, wage and hour, and traditional labor.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Arielle served as a law clerk at the New York City Human Resources Administration, Employment Law Unit, where she worked on a variety of employment discrimination and internal employee disciplinary issues.

Read more about Arielle E. Kobetz
Show more Show less
Photo of Laura Fant Laura Fant

As an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-chair of the Disability, Accommodations & Leave Management Practice Group, Laura Fant frequently counsels on employee leave and accommodation matters involving the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act…

As an associate in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-chair of the Disability, Accommodations & Leave Management Practice Group, Laura Fant frequently counsels on employee leave and accommodation matters involving the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act and related state and local laws. She also provides general employment counseling and has experience reviewing and updating employee handbooks and company policies, as well as providing training on topics such as discrimination and harassment in the workplace, social media, and the accommodation of physical and mental disabilities. Laura is a frequent contributor to Proskauer’s Law and the Workplace blog.

Before joining the Firm, Laura was assistant general counsel to the City of New York’s Office of Labor Relations. Prior to that, she was law clerk to Judge Jose L. Fuentes of the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, and a judicial intern to Judge Laura Taylor Swain of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Read more about Laura Fant
Show more Show less
Andrew Landesman

Andrew Landesman is a law clerk in the Labor Department and is a member of the Labor Management Relations & Sports Groups.

Read more about Andrew Landesman
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Law and the Workplace
  • Organization:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Subscribe to The American Legal Blogger

Subscribe Today
The American Legal Blogger logo
RSS Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
  • Home
  • About
  • Subscribe
  • Channels
  • Publishers
  • Contact

Welcome to American Legal Blogger

American Legal Blogger is a collaboration between the ABA Journal and LexBlog that brings together, in one place, the blogs, podcasts, and other insights and guidance generated by blogging lawyers across the US.

Learn more
Copyright © 2026, The American Legal Blogger. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo