On February 11, 2025, a U.S. District Court in Delaware issued a decision of first impression finding that a technology startup’s use of copyrighted materials to train its artificial intelligence platform infringed the copyright holder’s rights and did not constitute fair use.[1] The Delaware District Court is the first to decide on a
In a recent mixed decision that some news outlets reported as a win for art and antique dealers and others described as a win for conservationists, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the federal Endangered Species Act and its implementing regulations do not preempt the New York State Environmental
We recently reported on a preliminary injunction issued in Mary Miss v. Edmundson Art Foundation, Inc., temporarily barring the Des Moines Art Center from destroying Greenwood Pond: Double Site, artist Mary Miss’s well-known outdoor environmental art installation that is in a state of substantial disrepair due to exposure to the elements and wear-and-tear from visitors
On January 29, 2025, the U.S. Copyright Office released Part Two of its planned reports on the intersection between copyright and generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Titled “Part 2: Copyrightability,” the Report addresses a hot issue—the extent to which AI-generated outputs are entitled to copyright protection. The Report, after examining the existing legal framework—under which only
A lawsuit pending before Judge J. Paul Oetken of the District Court for the Southern District of New York may soon underscore the need to rethink the legal remedies available for potential legal violations aided by generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”).[1] As discussed previously on this blog, in July 2024, the U.S. Copyright Office
The recent copyright law landscape is rife with infringement lawsuits alleging that one song substantially copied the musical elements of another. As a music industry norm, songwriters frequently split the copyright of a single song with one or more co-authors, each owning exclusive rights in their respective shares of the work under the U.S. Copyright
On December 16, 2024, Shira Perlmutter, head of the U.S. Copyright Office,[1] provided the relevant subcommittees of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees with an update on the Copyright Office’s ambitious investigation into the intersection of generative Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) and copyright law and policy.[2]
In August 2023, as we reported previously on
On August 16, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed Italian artist Maurizio Cattelan’s legal victory in the copyright lawsuit fellow artist Joe Morford brought against him alleging that Comedian (2019), Cattelan’s famous duct-taped banana installation at Art Basel Miami Beach in 2019, infringed on Morford’s work entitled Banana and
On May 3, 2024, U.S. District Judge Stephen H. Locher of the Southern District of Iowa granted artist Mary Miss’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent the demolition or removal of her outdoor environmental artwork entitled Greenwood Pond: Double Site, which sits on the grounds of the Des Moines Art Center (the “Art Center”).
For the fifth year running, the Chambers High Net Worth guide, which focuses on the private wealth sector, recognized HHR as one of the nation’s leading law firms for Art and Cultural Property Law.
Chambers ranked HHR’s Art Law practice in the second-highest band among the top firms nationwide. “Hughes Hubbard have been acting in
